Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017 of Anju Chaturvedi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP28 Apr 2017FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This interim order fixed the deposit of use and occupation charges for premises in dispute while pending the appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The deposit must be made weekly within four weeks of the order.

What did the court decide?

Temporary direction to deposit use and occupation charges on monthly basis until next hearing on use and occupation charges.

FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017 of Anju Chaturvedi v/s The Deputy… — Banking and Recovery | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3230/DLI/2017 (U.A) MP-PMLA-3231/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3219/DLI/2017 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-3218/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3217/DLI/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017

¶3

Anju Chaturvedi …

¶4

Appellant/Applicant

¶5

Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the appellant	: Shri Partha Mehrotra, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶8

ORDER 28.04.2017

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017, MP-PMLA-3230/DLI/2017 (U.A), MPPMLA-3231/DLI/2017 (Stay), MP-PMLA-3219/DLI/2017 (U.A.), MPPMLA-3218/DLI/2017 (Stay) & MP-PMLA-3217/DLI/2017 (Exemption)

¶10

This order is passed in continuation with order dated 2^nd March,

¶11

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the rent pertaining to the property no. 97D-Eastern Avenue, Sainik Farms, New Delhi-110062 according to the appellant is Rs. 56,000/- with regard to property no. 98- Eastern Avenue, Sainik Farms, New Delhi-110062 is 63,000 as per the magic bricks.com. In view of the last order the FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017 Page 1 of 3

¶12

appellant agreed to deposit the said amount as mentioned above from the date of passing the impugned order.

¶13

On the other hand the learned counsel for the respondent submits that according to the respondent the rent of the said property is much higher and he and his client would verify the same and inform the tribunal on the next date of hearing. However he is agreeable that at this stage some order may be passed as per suggestion made on behalf of the appellant.

¶14

After furnishing the details on behalf of respondent, the interim directions as per suggestion made on behalf of appellant might be modified but till such time we are of the view that certain direction for use and occupation charges are liable to be passed. Accordingly the interim order shall continue till the next date of hearing subject to the deposit of the above mentioned amount as use and occupation charges by the appellant within four weeks from today. The appellant shall keep on depositing the said amount by 7^th of each month during the pendency of appeals or till the said order is vacated or modified.

¶15

List this application on 21^st July, 2017.

¶16

We may clarify that the said deposit shall be made from the date of passing the impugned order.

¶17

Reply in the main appeal has not been filed. The respondent is granted three weeks time to file the reply with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder thereafter. Liberty is

¶18

FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017

¶19

Page 2 of 3

¶20

granted to the respondent to file the replies in the interim application within two weeks.

¶21

List the appeal and stay application 21^st July, 2017.

¶22

Copy of the order be given ‘dasti’ to both the sides.

¶23

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶24

(G.C. Mishra) Member

(B.K. Bansal)

Member

New Delhi,

28^th April, 2017

¶29

‘d’

¶30

FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017

¶31

Page 3 of 3

FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017 of Anju Chaturvedi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1678/DLI/2017 of Anju Chaturvedi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases