The Appellate Tribunal directed formal notice to be issued in the appeal and stay application. The parties were permitted to file written synopses and the interim order was allowed to continue until the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3212/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1656/BNG/2017
Ramesh Kumar … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri R.B. Pardeshi, Advocate Shri R.V. Desai, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
31.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1656/BNG/2017 & MP-PMLA-3212/BNG/2017 (Stay)
Formal notice in the appeal has not been issued. Let the same be issued. Mr. N.K. Matta, advocate accepts the notice on behalf of Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate. Let the reply to the appeal and Stay application be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 8th September, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1656/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 2
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis on or
before the next date of hearing.
Interim order passed on 10th March, 2017 shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 31st March, 2017.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1656/BNG/2017
Page 2 of 2
Ramesh Kumar
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
