Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017 of M/s D.B. Jajodia (Huf) v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP20 Feb 2017FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal admitted fresh appeals and applications filed against orders dated December 2, 2016. The court directed the respondent to file replies within stipulated timeframes and clarified procedures regarding notices under section 8(4) of the Act. The matter was listed for future consideration.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued, respondent directed to file replies within six weeks and two weeks; appeals listed for hearing on 28.03.2017 and 08.05.2017.

FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017 of M/s D.B. Jajodia (Huf) v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3224/MUM/2017

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017

¶4

M/s D.B. Jajodia (HUF)

¶5

… Appellant/Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

¶8

… Respondent

¶9

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶10

For the appellant : Shri Aashutosh Srivastava, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER

¶11

ORDER 20.02.2017

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017

¶13

Fresh appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 2^nd December, 2016 under section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in complaint no. 627/2016. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent who seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.

¶14

List the appeal for consideration on 28^th March, 2017.

¶15

MP-PMLA-3224/MUM/2017

¶16

After filing the appeal, the fresh application has been filed. Registry to give number. Issue notice of the application to the respondent. Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent who seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017 Page 1 of 2

¶17

rejoinder two weeks thereafter. List the application for consideration on 8^th May, 2017.

¶18

The learned counsel for the respondent states that so far notice under section 8(4) of the Act has not been issued. In case the respondent intends to issue the notice under section 8(4) of the Act, the communication will be issued to the counsel as well as to the appellant. Liberty is granted to the appellant to move the application in case the said notice under section 8(4) of the Act will be received by the appellant.

¶19

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶20

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶21

New Delhi, 20^th February, 2017

¶22

‘R’

¶23

FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017

¶24

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017 of M/s D.B. Jajodia (Huf) v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017 of M/s D.B. Jajodia (Huf) v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases