The Appellate Tribunal fixed leave time of four weeks for filing rejoinder in an appeal and continued the interim order till the next date of hearing dated 9th January, 2018.
Leave granted to file rejoinder within four weeks; interim order extended till next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3224/MUM/2017
FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017
M/s D.B. Jajodia (HUF)
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Aashutosh Srivastava, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 21.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017
The learned counsel for respondent submits that reply is ready and he would be filing the same in the registry during the course of the day. A copy of the same has been handed over to the counsel for the appellant who seeks four weeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 9th January, 2018.
Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 21st August, 2017. ‘s’ FPA-PMLA-1635/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave is to be granted for filing rejoinder in time of four weeks
Whether interim order is to be extended to the next date of hearing
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s D.B. Jajodia (HUF)
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
