This order in an adjourned hearing grants a one-month extension for the respondent to file a reply. The appellant is directed to file a written synopsis by the next hearing date.
One month extension for the respondent to file a reply; directions to file written synopses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3078/CHN/2017 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1613/CHN/2017
N. Ajmal Khan & Anr. … Appellants/Applicants Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. A. Sriram Advocate On behalf of Mr. Vinodh Ranna, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana & Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate On Behalf of Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
08.09.2017
MP-PMLA-3078/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1613/CHN/2017
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One more opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 06th March, 2018.
In the meanwhile, both the parties may file the written synopsis on or
before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 08th September, 2017 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-1613/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Ajmal Khan & Anr.
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
