Order allowing the appellant to file a rejoinder within four weeks in an appeal filed before the Prevention of Money Laundering Act Appellate Tribunal.
Rejoinder permitted to be filed within four weeks; interim order continued pending listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3060/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017
Sulaikha
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. K.M. Suresh Chandran, Advocate Sh. Rakeesh Panicker, Advocate. For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent-2 : Shri Vikas Arora, Advocate (E.D)
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 11.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017
Reply in the main appeal has been filed. The counsel for the appellant submits that the valuation certificate pertaining to the attached property will be given for the purpose of fixing the use and occupation charges if any will be handed over to the counsel for the respondent in view of the order dated 13th January, 2017 within 15 days. In the meanwhile the appellant is allowed to file the rejoinder to the main appeal within four weeks.
List on 27th November, 2017.
Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
Copy of the order be given ‘ dasti’ to both the parties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 11th July, 2017 ‘K’ FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Sulaikha
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
