Single bench order on a stay petition under the PMLA citing an affidavit filed by the appellant and granting time to the respondent for reply. The matter was listed for future hearing.
Adjourned listing to 11th July, 2017; respondent given two weeks to respond to the affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3060/COCHIN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017
Sulaikha
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. K.M. Suresh Chandran, Advocate Sh. Rakeesh Panicker, Advocate.
For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 27.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017
Reply has been filed by the counsel for the respondent. Let the rejoinder be filed within four weeks.
MP-PMLA-3060/COCHIN/2017 (Stay)
An affidavit by way of undertaking in terms of the last order has been filed by the appellant. A copy has been served to the counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks two weeks time to respond. Let the same be done before the next date.
List on 11th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 27th March, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1601/COCHIN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Sulaikha
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
