FPA-PMLA-1598/DLI/2017 of Mr. Manish Jain v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Mr. Manish Jain V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3054/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1598/DLI/2017
Mr. Manish Jain
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri A.T. Patra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 04.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-1598/DLI/2017 & MP-PMLA-3054/DLI/2017 (Stay)
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity is granted to file the reply within three weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter. The learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out prayer (ii) of the appeal wherein relief is sought to issue the direction to furnish photocopies of the seized documents and a cloned copy of hard disk of the seized laptop so that the professional work of the applicant does not suffer. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite of two representations made by the appellant there is no response on behalf of the respondent. Shri Vikas Garg, learned counsel for the respondent
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Manish Jain
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · May
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1598/DLI/2017
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court