The Appellate Tribunal adjourned filed appeals and a stay application to May 4, 2017, giving the respondent four weeks to file replies.
Notice issued; respondent given four weeks to file replies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3054/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1598/DLI/2017
Mr. Manish Jain … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri A.T. Patra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 23.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1598/DLI/2017 & MP-PMLA-3054/DLI/2017 (Stay)
A fresh appeal has been filed by the appellant for challenging the order dated 22nd November, 2016 in O.A. 59/2016. Issue notice to the appeal as well as the stay application. Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks time to file the replies. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinders within four weeks thereafter.
List the appeal and application on 4th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
23rd February, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1598/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Mr. Manish Jain
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
