Appellant seeks time for respondent to file reply. Final opportunity given. List fixed. Interim order continues.
Time granted to file reply; listing made for 7th September 2017; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016
Smt. S. Vasuki … Applicant/Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
25.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016
Reply has not been filed. Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, learned counsel for the respondent seeks some time to file the reply. One final opportunity is granted to file the same within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 7th September, 2017.
Interim order shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 25th April, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Smt. S. Vasuki
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
