Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016 of Smt. S. Vasuki v/s Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP4 Jan 2017FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appellant applied for stay of attachment orders. Tribunal directed respondent to maintain status quo on specified properties pending appeal disposal and listed matter for further hearing.

What did the court decide?

Maintain status quo regarding two properties pending appeal disposal; appellant to file reply within six weeks.

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016 of Smt. S. Vasuki v/s Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2930/CHN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016

¶3

Smt. S. Vasuki … Appellant/Applicant Versus Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant	: Shri Jayanth Muthraj, Advocate For Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate
For the respondent	: Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	: MEMBER

¶6

ORDER 04.01.2017

¶7

MP-PMLA-2930/CHN/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016

¶8

The learned counsel for the appellant has informed that as regards the first attachment order, the ‘ status quo’ order was passed by the High Court of Madras in writ petition filed by the appellant in W.P. No. 14537 of 2015 and M.P (MD) No. 2/2015.

¶9

He states that in the second attachment order, at this stage, the appellant is pressing for stay in relation to two properties. The description of the same are as under:

¶10

1000 sq. ft. plot with a house situated at Ayan Velampatii

¶11

Village (Doc No. 1681/2010) amounting to Rs. 1,29,000/-

¶12

Chevrolet Tavera B3 amounting to Rs. 7,88,000/-

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

He undertakes on behalf of his client that till the disposal of the appeal, the appellant shall not dispose of or alienate the said moveable or immoveable properties or create any third party rights in any manner directly or indirectly.

¶16

In view of the statement made on behalf of the appellant and pending decision on the stay application, the respondent are directed to maintain the ‘ status quo’ in respect of the above mentioned properties till the next date of hearing. Reply to the application be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder four weeks thereafter.

¶17

List this application on 25^th April, 2017.

¶18

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶19

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

(Anand Kishore)

Member

New Delhi,

4^th January, 2017

¶24

‘A’

¶25

FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016

¶26

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016 of Smt. S. Vasuki v/s Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016 of Smt. S. Vasuki v/s Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases