List order in Foreign Protest Attendance proceedings where reply and written synopsis are directed to be filed by specific dates.
Dir to file reply and written synopsis by specified dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3787/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2929/CHN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1547/CHN/2016
Smt. S. Sugumari … Appellant/Applicant Versus Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER ORDER 07.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1547/CHN/2016
Reply has not been filed. The counsel for the respondent submits that reply is ready and would be filing the same during the course of the day in the registry. Let the same be done accordingly. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks.
List on 8th January, 2018.
Both the parties are also to file the written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.
The learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the appellant has been acquitted in the scheduled offence. Copy of the order
FPA-PMLA-1547/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 2
has been filed. A copy has been served to the head office. The response, if any, be filed by the respondent on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi,
7th September, 2017.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1547/CHN/2016
Page 2 of 2
Smt. S. Sugumari
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
