Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016 of Sri Rajeshekhar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

ATFP2 Mar 2017FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal disposed of a Miscellaneous Petition seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, allowing the prayer subject to costs. It also issued notices for an exemption application, adjourning further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Application for condonation of delay allowed subject to payment of Rs. 2000 costs. Liberty granted to file documents. Notice issued, reply filed within six weeks.

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016 of Sri Rajeshekhar v/s The Joint Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2898/BNG/2016 (Stay) MP- PMLA-2899/BNG/2016 (Exempt.) MP- PMLA-2900/BNG/2016 (COD)

¶3

¶4

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016

¶5

Sri Rajeshekhar … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the appellant	: Shri R.V. Naik, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶8

ORDER 02.03.2017

¶9

MP- PMLA-2900/BNG/2016 (COD)

¶10

The above mentioned application has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 49 days. On the last date of hearing the time was granted to file the reply. No reply has been filed. The prayer is allowed subject to the cost of Rs. 2000/- which shall be paid by the appellant to the counsel for the respondent within two weeks from today. Accordingly the Misc. Petition is disposed off.

¶11

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016, MP-PMLA-2898/BNG/2016 (Stay)

¶12

Issue notice to the counsel for the respondent. The reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

MP- PMLA-2899/BNG/2016 (Exempt.)

¶16

The counsel for the appellant is granted liberty to file the documents which are already part and parcel of Adjudicating Authority if so required.

¶17

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶18

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶19

(B.K. Bansal) Member

¶20

New Delhi, 2^nd March, 2017

¶21

‘K’

¶22

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016

¶23

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016 of Sri Rajeshekhar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1542/BNG/2016 of Sri Rajeshekhar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases