FPA-PMLA-1439/BNG/2016 of M.B. Vinutha v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Case brief
What is this about?
An adjournment order. The appellant is required to file a reply and the respondent will file a rejoinder within specified periods.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1439/BNG/2016
M.B. Vinutha … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Susheel, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate & Shri Manish Jain, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 06.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1439/BNG/2016
Reply has not been filed. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the same would be filing within one week. Rejoinder thereafter be filed within four weeks.
List on 11th August, 2017.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Matter adjourned for filing of reply and rejoinder.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.B. Vinutha
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · April
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1439/BNG/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court