A per incuriam order issued by the Appellate Tribunal dated 17.11.2016 acknowledging the appearance of counsel but adjourning proceedings without a recorded decision.
No substantive order or reasoning is provided in the document. The entry is a procedural acknowledgment of the hearing date and appearance of counsels only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1439/BNG/2016
M.B. Vinutha … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Susheel Joseph, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 17.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-1334/DLI/2016
List on 1st December, 2016.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member (B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 17th November, 2016. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1439/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
M.B. Vinutha
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
MANMOHAN SINGH
MISHRA
BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
