Single order allowing the respondent four weeks to file a reply. No one appeared for the appellant. The case was listed for further proceedings.
Granted four weeks to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1427/MUM/2016
Union Bank of India … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 11.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-1427/CHN/2016
Reply has not been filed on behalf of the respondent. One final opportunity is granted to the counsel for the respondent to file the reply within four weeks.
List on 16th August, 2017.
Since no one appeared on behalf of the appellant, copy of the order
be sent to the appellant and his counsel.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava)
Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 11th May, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1427/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Union Bank of India
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
