Appeal regarding money laundering under PMLA adjourned; respondent granted six weeks to file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1427/MUM/2016
Union Bank of India … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajeev Sagar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 08.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-1427/MUM/2016
Adjourned at the request of both sides.
In the meanwhile the counsel for the respondent is granted six
weeks time to file the reply with a copy to the appellant who may file rejoinder before the next date of hearing.
List on 9th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 8th December, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1427/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Union Bank of India
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
