Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016 of Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai & Ors.

ATFP16 Jan 2017FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This being a procedural order of the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, admitting an application for substituted service by publication on an unserved respondent due to return of speed post notice, and listing applications for future hearing.

What did the court decide?

Application for substituted service by publication allowed within two weeks.

FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016 of Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai & Ors. — ATFP (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3080/MUM/2017(Misc.) MP-PMLA-2638/MUM/2016(Stay) FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016 Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai & Ors. .… Respondents

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellants : Mr. Arjun Krishnan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER

¶5

ORDER

¶6

16.01.2017

¶7

MP-PMLA-3080/MUM/2017(Misc.)

¶8

Fresh application has been filed for the substituted service on unserved respondent no. 2 by way of publication. It is stated in the application that as per last order, the notice was sent by the Advocate to the Respondent no. 2 by Speed Post. However, the same has been returned with the remarks “unclaimed returned to sender” returned envelope has been enclosed alongwith the application. It is submitted that the appellant has only the last known address of respondent no. 2 , and no other address of this respondent is known to the appellant, therefore, there is no other way to effect service on the respondent no. 2 except by way of substituted service by way of publication. Issue notice to the respondent no. 1. The learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 has no objection if prayer is allowed in the said application. For the reasons stated in the application and discussed above, the prayer is allowed. The appellant is permitted to

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016 Page 1 of 2

¶10

serve the respondent no. 2 by way of

¶11

publication in the English

¶12

newspaper and Marathi newspaper having circulation in Mumbai area. The appellant will take necessary steps within two weeks from today.

¶13

List this application on 14^th February, 2017.

¶14

MP-PMLA-2638/MUM/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016

¶15

List on 14^th February, 2017.

¶16

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶17

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶18

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶19

New Delhi,

¶20

16^th January, 2017

¶21

„s‟

¶22

FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016

¶23

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016 of Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1406/MUM/2016 of Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases