This single line order of the Appellate Tribunal provides a final opportunity to file a reply and lists the appeal for final argument on 21 July, 2017. No substantive decision was rendered in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016
Anil Kumar Jalota & Anr.
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
… Appellants … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Pyoli, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
30.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List the appeal for final argument on 21st July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 30th March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1404/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Anil Kumar Jalota & Anr.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Justice Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
