The tribunal adjourned the appeal to consider the respondent's objection regarding maintainability on the next date of hearing.
No substantive legal proposition or decision of general application; the matter was adjourned to consider maintainability.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2630/MUM/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1395/MUM/2016
Godavari Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Gursimran Dhillon, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 11.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1395/MUM/2016
The counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment on the ground
that he has been engaged very recently. He has also filed the Vakalatnama. In the present case the objection has been raised by the respondent that the appeal is not maintainable. The said objection would be considered on the next date of hearing. The matter is adjourned.
List on 6th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 11th July, 2017 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1395/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Godavari Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
