The Tribunal noted the failure to file replies to the appeal/application. It granted the respondent an opportunity to file a reply within four weeks and listed the matter for 18.01.2018, while continuing the interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3711/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3712/KOL/2017 (A.D.)
&
FPA-PMLA-1359/KOL/2016
Santanu Ghosh … Appellant / Applicant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Rishabh Sohail, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S. A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 26.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-1359/KOL/2016
Reply to the appeal as well as the application have not been filed.
One more opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the same within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 18th January, 2018.
Interim Order to Continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 26th October, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1359/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Santanu Ghosh
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
