Single-line listing order. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2016 (PMLA) Appellate Tribunal set the hearing for the next date after the appellant waived the need for a rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1297/AHD/2016
Shri Dharmendrasinh V. Chauhan … Appellant/Applicant @ Dharmin Chauhan Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Parmatma Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 21.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1297/AHD/2016
Pleadings are complete as learned Counsel for the Appellant
submits that rejoinder is not necessary.
List the matter on 4th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 21st March, 2017 ‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1297/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Dharmendrasinh V. Chauhan
Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
