Listed for final argument regarding stays and FPA under PMLA. Adjourned pending receipt of rejoinder copies, with the appellant agreeing to supply a copy on the next date.
Listed for argument on 24.03.2017; interim order continued; adjourned pending rejoinder copies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2550/DLI/2016 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016
Sanjeev Tyagi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, … Respondent Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Manav Gupta, Advocate Shri Esha Dutta, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
20.01.2017
MP-PMLA-2550/DLI/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016
Pleadings in the above said matters are complete. The matter is listed for final argument. The counsel for the respondent submits that the copies of the rejoinders were not received. However, records show that the copies of the rejoinders were served on 13th January, 2017. However, the learned counsel for the appellant is very fairly agreeable to supply other copy of rejoinder today itself.
List for argument in the appeal alongwith stay application on 24th March, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 20th January, 2017. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
Sanjeev Tyagi
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
