List and interim order in an appeal where the appellant was directed to file an affidavit and the respondent to file a response by specified dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1265/CHN/2016
Union Bank of India … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri P.B.A. Srinivasan, Advocate Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| For the respondent no. 5 | : Shri R. Vardarajan, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI ANAND KISHORE |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
ORDER
26.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1265/CHN/2016
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Union Bank of India and Andhra Bank & Anr. submits that affidavit in terms of the last order dated 8th August, 2017 and he would be filing the same in the registry within one week. Copy of the same has been served to the counsel for the appellant as well as the respondent. Let the same be filed within one week. Response, if any, on behalf of Shri T.D. Naidu and respondent be filed before the next date of hearing.
List on 20th November, 2017.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 26th September, 2017. ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1265/CHN/2016 Page 1 of 1
Union Bank of India
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
