Single-line dismissal order where the appellant failed to appear to argue an application for condonation of delay; the court dismissed the application and the underlying appeal without hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2465/CHN/2016 (COD) MP-PMLA-2466/CHN/2016 (Exemp) FPA-PMLA-1262/CHN/2016
Haji Ali … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Nihargan Maurya, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 06.02.2017
MP-PMLA-2465/CHN/2016 (COD)
The appellant has challenged the impugned order dated 12th November, 2010 in the appeal filed in 2016.
The application for Condonation of Delay is listed. No arguing person is available to argue the application. Even on the last date of hearing similar thing has happened
The application is accordingly dismissed. The appeal is also dismissed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 6th February, 2017 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1262/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Haji Ali
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
