Appeal against proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Court noted delay and granted final opportunity to argue condonation of delay, listing the matter for further hearing.
Final opportunity granted to appellant to argue condonation of delay in filing appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2465/CHN/2016 (COD) MP-PMLA-2466/CHN/2016 (Exemp) FPA-PMLA-1262/CHN/2016
Haji Ali … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondents
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri G. Anand Selvam, Advocate Shri Ram Shankar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 08.12.2016
MP-PMLA-2465/CHN/2016 (COD)
There is a long delay in filing the appeal. On the last date of hearing
the appellant was allowed to take the necessary steps to correct the appeal and remove the defects. As far as removal of the defects is concerned, the said order is complied with. One final opportunity is granted to the appellant to argue the application for condonation of delay.
List on 6th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 8th December, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1262/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Haji Ali
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Justice Kaushal Srivastava
Justice Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
