A listing order in an appeal filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), directing parties to file a written synopsis for the final hearing.
No substantive legal principle was laid down. The Appellate Tribunal simply listed the appeal for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2501/BBS/2016(A.D.) MP-PMLA-2350/BBS/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1192/BBS/2016
Serajuddin & Co. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Shariq Nisar, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 24.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1192/BBS/2016
Pleadings are complete. Both the parties have requested that the
appeal be listed for final hearing.
List on 12th May, 2017.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis on or before
the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 24th March, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1192/BBS/2016
Page 1 of 1
Serajuddin & Co.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneswar
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
