The Appellate Tribunal instructed counsel to exchange documents: the respondent to file a reply copy within two weeks, the appellant to submit a rejoinder within four weeks, and both parties to file written synopses. The matter was listed for final argument.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2231/JL/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015 Dalip Singh Mann … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate on behalf of Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 22.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015
Reply has been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the appellant states that copy of the same has not been received. He has informed us that counsel for the respondent has promised to send the copy by e-mail. Let the same be done within two weeks. The counsel for the appellant states that rejoinder if any be filed within four weeks. Both the parties will file the written synopsis. The respondent will file two extra copies of the reply in the registry who will place the copies of the reply in both the files.
FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015
Page 1 of 2
List for final argument on 11th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
22nd February, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015
Page 2 of 2
Dalip Singh Mann
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
