FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015 of Dailp Singh Mann v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2231/JL/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015

¶3

Dailp Singh Mann … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant : Shri Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER [ ORDER 13.07.2017

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015

¶7

Reply has been filed by the respondent. Mr. Saud, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the copy has been E-mailed to the learned Counsel of the appellant. The rejoinder be filed by the appellant within four weeks. Both parties are also granted six weeks time to file written arguments. Mr. Saud states that instead of filing of written arguments, his client will file the copy of the prosecution complaint which contains all the details. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the appellant who is granted six weeks time to file written synopsis.

¶8

List on 31^st October, 2017.

¶9

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶10

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶11

(B.K. Bansal) Member

¶12

New Delhi, 13^th July, 2017

¶13

‘r’

¶14

FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015

¶15

Page 1 of 1

FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015 of Dailp Singh Mann v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1127/JL/2015 of Dailp Singh Mann v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases