Order in money laundering proceeding setting aside ex-parte proceedings against Nitesh J. Thakur subject to filing of Vakalatnama by next hearing date.
Ex-parte proceedings against Nitesh J. Thakur were set aside, subject to filing of vakalatnama by the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3048/MUM/2016(Misc) MP-PMLA-2203/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1112/MUM/2015
M/S Ace Card Infrasol Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate Shri Arjun Krishnan, Advocate Shri Gauri Puri, Advocate Shri Ankur Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| Respondents for Nitesh J. Thakur | : : : |
Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rahul Narayan, Mr. Shashwat Goel, Mr. Ajit Sanjyoti Redkar, Mr. Rohan Tamhane & Ms. Sanjyoti Redkar, Advocates |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
29.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1112/MUM/2015
Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate seeks three weeks time to produce the
copy of the statements recorded under Section- 50 in relation to Samata Nagar Property and relied upon document of all requisite O.Cs. The learned counsel for the appellant has no objection.
Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Advocate appears on behalf of the Shri Nitesh J. Thakur, who has already been proceeded ex-parte. The appellant in all the matters and respondent have no objection if the order of ex-parte proceeding against the Nitesh J. Thakur is withdrawn subject to the
FPA-PMLA-1112/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 2
condition that proper Vakalatnama in accordance with the law be filed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Nitesh J. Thakur. Let the Vakalatname be filed on or before the next date of hearing with the latest address of Nitesh J. Thakur. Subject to file the Vakalatnama, the exparte proceedings against Nitesh J. Thakur are set-asides.
List on 02nd May, 2017 at 2:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 29th March, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1112/MUM/2015
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ex-parte proceedings against Nitesh J. Thakur should be set aside upon filing of a Vakalatnama.
M/S Ace Card Infrasol Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Nitesh J. Thakur
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
