The appellate tribunal dismissed an appeal in a money laundering matter as the appellant did not appear for the hearing. No substantive ground was considered.
The appeal was dismissed for non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2164/KOL/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1090/KOL/2015
Rose Valley Infotech Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 21.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1090/KOL/2015
The matter is listed for hearing. No one appears on behalf of the
appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 21st April, 2017 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1090/KOL/2015
Page 1 of 1
Rose Valley Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
B. K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
