The Appellate Tribunal granted the respondent four weeks to file a reply to the rejoinder in matter MP-PMLA-1937/DLI/2015 and listed matters for hearing on 13 July 2017.
Extended time for filing reply; matter listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1937/DLI/2015 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-1033/DLI/2015
Media Exim Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Prithu Garg, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 03.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1033/DLI/2015
Rejoinder has been filed. The same is taken on record.
MP-PMLA-1937/DLI/2015 (u/s 35)
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity to file the reply is
granted to the respondent within four weeks with an advance copy to the
counsel for the appellant.
List this application alongwith the appeal on 13th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 3rd March, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1039/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant additional time to the respondent to file reply to the rejoinder.
Whether to list the application and appeal together.
How to handle the absence of a reply in the main appeal matter.
Media Exim Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
