Appeal under Section 35 of the PMLA against an interim order. The tribunal adjourned proceedings to allow the appellant to file a rejoinder, noting the respondent's reply was not on record.
Time granted to file rejoinder within four weeks; matter adjourned to March 3, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1937/DLI/2015 (u/s 35) FPA-PMLA-1033/DLI/2015
Media Exim Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri, Abhay Pratap Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Niraj Atri, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
02.12.2016
MP-PMLA-1937/DLI/2015 (u/s 35)
The respondent has filed the reply to the appeal as well as the interim application in the registry, however, the same is not on record. The copies have been handed over to the learned counsel for the appellant who seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be done within four weeks.
List on 3rd March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal)
Member
New Delhi, 2nd December, 2016 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1033/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Media Exim Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
