This order directs the appellant to grant four weeks to file a response to a reply filed by the applicant's representative in a miscellaneous PMLA proceeding. The matter is listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3038/MUM/2016 (Misc) MP-PMLA-2054/MUM/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015
ACE Card Infrasol Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Arjun Krishnan, Advocate Shri Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate with Shri Nilesh J. Thakur, Appellant For the Respondent : Shri S. A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER ORDER 27.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015
Reply on behalf of Mr. Nilesh J. Thakur has been filed. The respondent No. 1 and appellant(s) are granted four weeks time to file the response thereof.
List on 14th September, 2017 at 02:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 27th July, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 1
ACE Card Infrasol Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
