FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015 of Ace Card Infrasol Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

For the appellant : Shri Arjun Krishnan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER

¶12

ORDER

¶13

24.11.2016

¶14

MP-PMLA-2054/MUM/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015

¶15

Reply to the appeal and the stay application has not been filed by the respondent no. 1. Let the same may be done within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder or on before the next date of hearing.

¶16

From the record it appears that respondent no. 2 to 5 is yet to be served. The appellant to take the necessary steps to serve him by Registered A.D. Post.

¶17

In the meanwhile, in view of the averments made in the stay application the operation of the impugned order dated 31^st August, 2015 shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.

¶18

FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

List on 14^th February, 2017.

¶21

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

(Anand Kishore)

Member

New Delhi,

24^th November, 2016

¶26

‘d’

¶27

FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015

¶28

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015 of Ace Card Infrasol Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1005/MUM/2015 of Ace Card Infrasol Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases