FPA-ND-64/DLI/2016 of Som Pal v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Som Pal V/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-150/DLI/2016 (COD) & FPA-ND-64/DLI/2016
Som Pal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rahul Sahdev, Advocate for Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vinod Malhotra, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
19.04.2017
FPA-ND-64/DLI/2016
The matter was heard on the last date of hearing. While dictating it transpired that certain documents which were referred in the reply were not annexed. Mr. D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner submits that he has filed the same in the Registry. Copy of the same be supplied to the learned counsel for the appellant. Let the rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Som Pal
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Coram
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court