Single-appeal notice order allowing recording of remaining appellant counsel appearance. No substantive ruling on merits recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-139/BOM/2017 (Resto.) FPA-ND-44/BOM/2016
M/s Saurabh Tours … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. N. N. Gawankar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Stanly Joseph, I. O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 10.07.2017
MP-ND-139/BOM/2017 (Resto.) & FPA-ND-44/BOM/2016
Fresh application has been filed for restoration in the appeal. No
one appears on behalf of the appellant/applicant.
Re-notify on 19th September, 2017.
Later on, this matter was mentioned by Mr. N. N. Gawankar, Learned Counsel of the appellant who requested that his appearance may be recorded. Let the appearance of the counsel be recorded.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 10th July, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-ND-44/BOM/2016
Page 1 of 1
M/s Saurabh Tours
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
