The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property dismissed an appeal filed by M/s Saurabh Tours against The Competent Authority, Mumbai. The appeal was dismissed for default as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-44/BOM/2016
M/s Saurabh Tours … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | None |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Ratnesh Srivastava, I.O |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
23.01.2017
FPA-ND-44/BOM/2016
The matter was taken on second call. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant. We have noticed that oneven earlier occasion on 18th July, 2016 and 18th October, 2016 no representation was made on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
23rd January, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-ND-44/BOM/2016
Page 1 of 1
M/s Saurabh Tours
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
