FPA-ND-16/DLI/2013 of Sh. Harpal Singh v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
ATFPFPA-ND-16/DLI/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property directed the Registry to issue a fresh notice to the appellant and his counsel at the correct address, as the previous notice was not issued.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
¶2
MP-ND-126/DLI/2015 (Rest.) FPA-ND-16/DLI/2013
¶3
Sh. Harpal Singh … Appellant/Applicant
¶4
Versus
¶5
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
¶6
… Respondent
¶7
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶8
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
¶9
ORDER 09.08.2017
¶10
FPA-ND-16/DLI/2013
¶11
Registry has not issued the notice to the appellant as per last order dated 21st April, 2017.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Harpal Singh
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Coram
AI extract
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court