FPA-1/DLI/2015 of Late Shri Chandra Kumar Jain v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal did not determine the main appeal but sought an adjournment of the case for 19th April, 2017 to enable the respondent counsel to submit arguments. Liberty to file written synopsis was granted to both parties, and an interim order was permitted to continue.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
MP-7/DLI/2015 (Stay)
FPA-1/DLI/2015
Late Shri Chandra Kumar Jain … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Yoginder Handoo, Advocate & Shri Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate for Competent Authority CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
06.04.2017
FPA-1/DLI/2015
Learned counsel for the appellant has concluded his submission. an adjournment be sought on behalf of the respondent as counsel states that he has been recently engaged. List on 19th April, 2017 for the submission of the respondent. Both the parties are also granted liberty to file the written synopsis.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Late Shri Chandra Kumar Jain
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Coram
MANMOHAN SINGH
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court