Appellant sought further adjournment for non-compliance with previous order, citing counsel's absence due to family bereavement. Appeal dismissed with penalty.
Adjacent adjournment granted subject to deposit of Rs. 10,000 cost in Prime Minister Relief Fund within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-83/LKW/2013 (Rest.) FPA-80/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Devender Singh, Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shi Anil Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
16.02.2017
FPA-80/LKW/1996
A proxy counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and seeks yet another adjournment. Last order has not been complied by appellant. The cost has not been deposited in Prime Minister Relief Fund. He is not aware about whether the cost has been deposited or not. No proof has been produced. He submits that the arguing counsel is busy in Bangalore, as there is a death in his family.
As a matter of Fact, it appears that even the last order has not been complied with. The matter is adjourned subject to cost of Rs. 10000 /-
FPA-80/LKW/1996
Page 1 of 2
(Ten thousand) in each matter. The cost shall be deposited in Prime Minister Relief Fund within four weeks.
List this matter on 31st March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 16th February, 2017
‘s’
FPA-80/LKW/1996
Page 2 of 2
Vishal Singh Jaiswal
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
