This order by the Appellate Tribunal records that the respondent advocate was newly engaged and the file unavailable, resulting in the appeal being listed for a future date. The appellant noted a party's death.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) FPA-75/LKW/1996
Vikas Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate Shri Sharad Prakash Narain, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
31.03.2017
FPA-75/LKW/1996
Mr. Munish Kumar, Ld. Advocate submits that he has been recently engaged by the Department and yet he has not received the file from the earlier counsel. Thus the appeal may be heard after some days.
Shri Anurag Singh, Ld. Advocate for the appellant submits that one of the party Smt. Sunita Jaiswal has died on 23rd February, 2017. He submits that if necessary, the legal representative of Sunita Jaiswal will
FPA-75/LKW/1996
Page 1 of 2
take the appropriate steps. He also seeks relief for waiver of costs imposed on the last date of hearing.
List the appeal also on 25th July, 2017 alongwith pending
applications.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 31st March, 2017.
‘s’
FPA-75/LKW/1996
Page 2 of 2
Vikas Singh Jaiswal
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
