FPA-75/LKW/1996 of Vikas Singh Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
Vikas Singh Jaiswal V/s The Competent…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) FPA-75/LKW/1996 Vikas Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Devender Singh, Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shi Anil Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 16.02.2017
FPA-75/LKW/1996
A proxy counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and seeks yet another adjournment. Last order has not been complied by appellant. The cost has not been deposited in Prime Minister Relief Fund. He is not aware about whether the cost has been deposited or not. No proof has been produced. He submits that the arguing counsel is busy in Bangalore, as there is a death in his family.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vikas Singh Jaiswal
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Coram
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court