This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-50/BOM/2003 Yasmin Hanif Landa … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. S. K. Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Stanly Joseph, I. O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 07.09.2017
FPA-50/BOM/2003
The learned counsel for appellant has confirmed that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has dismissed the stay application filed by the appellant and now the appeal is to be decided on merits.
List this appeal on 5th March, 2018 to 7th March, 2018 at 2:30 pm as both sides have informed that atlest three days time would take to complete the arguments.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 7th September, 2017
‘S’
FPA-50/BOM/2003
Page 1 of 1
Yasmin Hanif Landa
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
