FPA-42/DLI/2016 of K.C. Verma v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order from the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property noted a divergence in valuation claims between parties regarding a residential property. The bench held that the appeal was expatiated (moot) as the direction to deposit Rs. 70,000 monthly remains in force pending disposal. Parties were listed for final hearing and instructed to file written submissions before the next
What did the court decide?
Ordered that the existing monthly deposit of Rs. 70,000 continues to be made till the disposal of the appeal.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
MP-114/DLI/2016(Addl. Doc) MP-113/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-42/DLI/2016
K.C. Verma … Appellant Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate Sh. D.S Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.02.2017
FPA-42/DLI/2016
Valuation report has been filed by the respondent. It is taken on record. It is stated that the market rent of the said property is Rs.1 lakh 12 thousand. On the other hand Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate counsel for the appellant submits that the market rent of the said property is less than Rs. 70 thousands. It is a residential property and any part of the property is not used for commercial purpose. There are two versions given y the parties.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed regarding the valuation of the property is maintainable and requires continuing deposit on appeal.
What rental charge, if any, shall remain in deposit during the pendency of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.C. Verma
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · February
- Case no.
- FPA-42/DLI/2016
- Topic
- Property and Title
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court