The appellate court granted liberty to the appellant to file a written synopsis and listed the matter for remaining argument on a future date. No operative disposition was recorded.
Liberty to file written synopsis granted; matter listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
MP-114/DLI/2016 (Addl. Doc.) FPA-42/DLI/2016
Shri K.C. Verma … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri D.S Bisht, Joint Commissioner Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 05.05.2017
MP-114/DLI/2016 (Addl. Doc.) & FPA-42/DLI/2016
Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Learned Counsel for the appellant has made his submission for sometime. List for remaining argument on 07th July, 2017. The Appellant is granted liberty to file the written synopsis.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 05th May, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-42/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Shri K.C. Verma
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
