Single-line order listed the matter for future hearing due to the absence of arguing counsel caused by the appellant's advocate's wife's illness.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-35/MDS/2015
Ms. Jish Jinnah … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Koshy Jacob, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Joint Commissioner and Shri L. Christopher Vasanth, Inspecting Officer |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 28.03.2017
FPA-35/MDS/2015
The arguing counsel is not available due to illness of his wife. List on 25th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 28th March, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-35/MDS/2015
Page 1 of 1
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri Kaushal Srivastava
Shri Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
