Appellant sought adjournment due to counsel's illness. Tribunal granted last chance to argue and listed matter for next date. No substantive decision or legal principle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-35/MDS/2015
Ms. Jish Jinnah … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Koshy Jacob, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri L. Christopher Vasanth, I.O. |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
17.10.2016
FPA-35/MDS/2015
Yet another adjournment is sought on behalf of appellant on the ground that the main counsel Mr. Adolf Mathew, Advocate is not feeling well. The counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and submits that the matter would be argued on the next date of hearing and seeks two weeks adjournment.
Last opportunity is granted to argue the matter and no further adjournment is to be granted on the next date of hearing.
List on 22nd November, 2016.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 17th October, 2016
‘s’
FPA-35/MDS/2015
Page 1 of 1
Ms. Jish Jinnah
The Competent Authority, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
