FPA-34/MUM/2015 of Mithubawa Padhiyar And Anr. v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Mithubawa Padhiyar And Anr. V/s The…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-122/MUM/2016 (MISC) MP-91/MUM/2015 (Stay) & FPA-34/MUM/2015 Mithubawa Padhiyar And Anr. … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | Sh. Someshchandra Zha, Advocate Sh. Salim M. Saiyed, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Siddhartha Majumdar, I.O. |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI ANAND KISHORE |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORD 29.08. |
ER 2017 |
FPA-ND-34/MUM/2015
We have been informed that the Appellant No.1 Shri Mithubawa Padhiyar has expired on 28th April, 2017. His counsel appearing earlier submits that legal representatives of decease intends to file the application to imply themselves. Let them do so in accordance with law.
List this matter on 7th February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mithubawa Padhiyar And Anr.
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court