FPA-34/MUM/2015 of Mithubawa Padhiyar and Anr. v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Mithubawa Padhiyar and Anr. V/s The…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-122/MUM/2016 (Misc.) MP-91/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-34/MUM/2015
Mithubawa Padhiyar and Anr. … Applicants/Appellants
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Neel Kamal Mishra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner on behalf of Competent Authority, Mumbai
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER ORDER 17.01.2017
MP-122/MUM/2016 (Misc.), MP-91/MUM/2015 (Stay) & FPA-34/MUM/2015
Letter dated 4th January, 2017 has been received from the Competent Authority, Mumbai seeking adjournment on certain grounds. Request is not opposed by the learned counsel for the appellants.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mithubawa Padhiyar and Anr.
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court